Insights

Funnel Vision: Why Marketing Needs to Catch Up With How People Actually Buy

Funnel Vision: Why marketing needs to catch up with how people actually buy

A few days before heading to Advertising Week New York, I glanced at my wardrobe and realized I needed a new pair of sneakers. I already had a brand in mind, but pressed for time, I chose to buy them on Amazon rather than the brand’s own website.

Brand mattered, but speed mattered more. There was no lengthy consideration phase or carefully plotted journey between touchpoints. I had a problem and found the quickest way to solve it.

From my perspective, as a consumer, that experience wasn’t complicated at all. It only gets complicated when marketers try to squeeze it back into a funnel.

That’s where ‘Funnel vision’ comes in. The very topic I took to the Creative Stage at Advertising Week to discuss.

‘Funnel vision’ is the tendency to keep planning around a linear journey from awareness to consideration to purchase, when that bears very little resemblance to how people actually behave.

The funnel was built for a different world, when the path between discovering something and buying it was easier to separate into distinct stages. The problem is that, while consumer behavior has changed dramatically, much of the structure around marketing hasn’t. Budgets are still divided into awareness and performance. Channels are given specific jobs. Campaigns are planned around where we think somebody should be in their journey.

Meanwhile, the consumer is happily ignoring all of it.

AI Is Making the Old Journey Even Harder To Defend

This becomes even more pronounced as AI starts to play a bigger role in discovery. Consumers never lie to a search bar, but an LLM potentially tells us even more. Instead of entering a handful of keywords, people can explain what they need, why they need it, what matters to them, and the constraints they are working within.

The difference is also in what comes back. Search traditionally presented consumers with a curated selection of possible and relevant answers and left them to continue the research themselves. Increasingly, people are asking AI for the answer itself.

That creates a very different challenge for brands. If someone asks an AI assistant for a recommendation, being somewhere on page one is no longer necessarily enough. Brands need enough credible, useful information out in the world for AI systems to understand what they offer, the problems they solve, and when they are a relevant answer. That makes GEO increasingly important, but it also makes the quality and authority of the content behind it matter.

AI should also make it possible to create relevant content at a scale that was previously difficult or prohibitively expensive. But simply producing more content shouldn't be the ambition. The opportunity is to use that scale to be genuinely useful in more of the places where consumers are making decisions, while consistently sounding and behaving like the same brand wherever they find you.

Personalization Doesn’t Mean Knowing Everything About Someone

That same consumer-first thinking should apply to personalization. Marketers have spent years working towards one-to-one communication, but we need to challenge the assumption behind it: do consumers actually want brands to know them that well?

Probably not. What they want is for brands to understand the problem they are trying to solve.

There is a meaningful difference between recognizing that someone needs comfortable sneakers delivered tomorrow and demonstrating that you know an uncomfortable amount about their life. AI gives marketers access to far richer signals around intent, but having more information doesn’t automatically mean we should use all of it. Good personalization should make an experience more relevant or useful, rather than proving how clever the technology behind it is.

Start With What You Want the Consumer To Do

Moving beyond the funnel also means reconsidering how marketing plans are built and measured. My advice? Start with the outcome, particularly when the objective is commercial growth. Where can the purchase happen? What needs to be true for somebody to make it? Where are those consumers spending their time? From there, marketers can work backwards to build the right experience around them.

It also changes which numbers deserve our attention. An enormous impression figure may look good in a presentation, but it doesn’t tell us much about whether marketing changed behavior. Incremental sales and incremental customers are far more interesting: did we reach somebody new, did they buy, and did our activity create growth that wouldn’t otherwise have happened?

There may not be another neat diagram waiting to replace the funnel, and perhaps there doesn’t need to be. The more useful shift is to stop designing marketing around our own structures and start with how people actually behave.

As AI changes how people discover products, research choices, and make decisions, that principle becomes even more important. The technology might be changing incredibly quickly, but the person on the other side of it is still human. Marketing should plan accordingly.


Report
27 Min Read May 19, 2026
ACX OG image

The ACx Report

The state of Agentic Customer Experience — how agentic intelligence is reshaping the way the world's best brands connect, convert and compete.
Read more

Article
5 Min Read Apr 15, 2026
Text on a blue background states, "77% of B2B Buying Journeys Now Involve AI. Most Manufacturers Haven’t Caught Up." Geometric shapes included.

77% of B2B Buying Journeys Now Involve AI. Most Manufacturers Haven’t Caught Up.

77% of B2B buying journeys now involve AI—before buyers ever contact a supplier. Here's how manufacturers can adapt their digital strategy to keep up.
Read more
 

We respect your privacy

We and selected third parties use cookies or similar technologies for technical purposes and, with your consent, for other purposes as specified in the cookie policy. Denying consent may make related features unavailable.